JPMorgan Chase is the top active commercial lender in this week’s bracket and it wasn’t particularly close in CRE. Co-leading the $3.3 billion 350 Park Avenue construction loan while Bank of America closed zero CRE deals last week is the kind of data gap that doesn’t require a tiebreaker. The Growth Capital game was different: both lenders participated in the Watsco $750 million revolving credit. The tracker standing broke that tie. JPMorgan moves to both the CRE and Growth Capital championships.

Active commercial lenders Lender of the Week JPMorgan Chase Semifinals Week 3 October 2026
DealVerticalJPMorgan RoleAmount
350 Park Ave construction, NYCCRECo-lead (with Wells Fargo)$3.3B
Watsco revolving credit facilityGCJoint lead arranger$750M
Total disclosed$4.05B

The Lender Draft Semifinals

CRE: JPMorgan Chase vs. Bank of America

Semifinals, CRE: JPMorgan Chase vs. Bank of America Winner: JPMorgan Chase. Declared. Why: JPMorgan Chase co-led the $3.3 billion 350 Park Avenue construction loan in New York last week. Bank of America closed zero CRE deals. One deal versus none, and the deal is the largest single financing in this week’s package.

Growth Capital: JPMorgan Chase vs. Bank of America

Semifinals, GC: JPMorgan Chase vs. Bank of America Winner: JPMorgan Chase. Why: Both lenders participated in Watsco’s $750 million revolving credit facility as joint lead arrangers last week. Tied on deal count, tied on disclosed volume. JPMorgan Chase edged out due to their leading market share with 33 deals closed in the vertical this year, over Bank of America at rank 2 with 27 deals.

I’ll say what Bank of America did right here. As the administrative agent on Watsco, BofA holds the senior operational role in the credit, managing the borrower relationship and the lender group. That is not a small thing. But the bracket is the bracket, and JPMorgan came in with a stronger year-to-date track record in growth capital.

“Azuna has built a differentiated, fast-growing brand in a category where consumers have long been underserved by products that simply mask odors.” David Enright, Partner and Head of Direct Lending, Chicago Atlantic

That quote is from a separate GC deal last week, not from Watsco. Chicago Atlantic closed a $17.5 million term loan for Azuna, a home fragrance company, and Enright named a real market gap as the thesis. The discipline of lending into a category thesis rather than a company story is what I see in the better GC credits right now.

ABL: SLR Business Credit vs. Oxford Commercial Finance

Semifinals, ABL: SLR Business Credit vs. Oxford Commercial Finance Winner: SLR Business Credit. Declared. Why: SLR Business Credit closed one ABL deal last week, a $9 million factoring facility for Purecare. Oxford Commercial Finance closed zero. Declared winner.

This was the featured ABL game because the Purecare deal is the largest disclosed ABL deal in the vertical outside the Belk mega-facility. Of the active commercial lenders remaining in the ABL bracket, SLR sits at rank 13 going into the championship against SouthStar Capital at rank 1.

The Lender Draft Full Semifinals Results

VerticalGameLender ALender BWinner
CRESemifinal 1Societe GeneraleCitigroupSociete Generale
CRESemifinal 2JPMorgan ChaseBank of AmericaJPMorgan Chase
GCSemifinal 1JPMorgan ChaseBank of AmericaJPMorgan Chase
GCSemifinal 2MUFGCitigroupCitigroup
ABLSemifinal 1SouthStar CapitalSallyport Commercial FinanceSouthStar Capital
ABLSemifinal 2SLR Business CreditOxford Commercial FinanceSLR Business Credit

Rest of the scoreboard: CRE: Societe Generale. GC: Citigroup. ABL: SouthStar Capital.

Note on GC Semifinal 2: Neither MUFG nor Citigroup closed a Growth Capital deal last week. All available factors were reviewed. Citigroup carries documented OCC and Federal Reserve consent orders as ongoing structural headwinds, noted here as the main counterweight. With every factor reviewed and the field neutral on last week’s GC activity, Citigroup’s overall standing in our Growth Capital tracker carried it: 33 deals closed in the vertical, ahead of MUFG with 24.

Next Week: The Lender Draft Championships

VerticalChampionship Matchup
CRESociete Generale vs. JPMorgan Chase
GCJPMorgan Chase vs. Citigroup
ABLSouthStar Capital vs. SLR Business Credit

JPMorgan Chase is in two of the three championship matchups. If you are a borrower or broker trying to get in front of active commercial lenders right now, that context matters.

The Lender Draft Active Commercial Lenders That Moved

VerticalLenderRankCoinciding Deal
CREBarings#22 (Up 6 from rank 28)Speedway Commerce Center industrial refi $138.6M
CREBNP Paribas#29 (Up 5 from rank 34)Akaysha Energy BESS Australia $1.248B (International CRE)
ABLWells Fargo# 11 (Up 7 from rank 18)Belk $1.275B ABL revolver and FILO (agent)
ABLPost Road Equipment Finance#22 (Up 6 from rank 28)No confirmed ABL deal this week; coinciding deal not identified
ABLSiena Lending Group#17 (Up 4 from rank 21)$20M organic beverage revolving credit
GCCIBC Bank USA#29 (Up 5 from rank 34)Channel revolving credit $135M
GCICBC#17 (Up 4 from rank 21)Huawei CNY 15B facility (International GC)

Counts reflect closed financings announced October 13 to 19, 2026 and tracked by The Lender Draft. Amounts are as announced.

Keep reading:

Top Industrial
Top City
Frauds and Bankruptcies
ABL Niche Focus
Market Signals
Commercial Real Estate Lender Rankings
Growth Capital Lender Rankings
Asset-Based Lender Rankings

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top